How does learning in, through or about art change when we begin to look at moving beyond a standard, Western European based, middle class curriculum? What to these “special” cases reveal to us about the central issues for our practice as art educators?
In order to understand art, looking at moving beyond a standard Western European based middle class curriculum is needed. In doing so, students begin to understand that art is a universal and interpretive means of communication. Though it's hard to understand at first, looking at art from beyond Western-Euro art, different aesthetics can help a person learn a multitude of things.
The issue with multi-cultural art teaching is the danger of teaching what one doesn't know or understand. Art classes become crafty and the cultural meaning behind any art becomes lost in a sense of 'lets just get it done'. Though it's hard to incorporate different cultures into art education, I believe it is beneficial. It would take a lot of effort on behalf of the students and teachers to get to a point where studying beyond Western-Euro middle class art is meaningful. We shouldn't confine our cultural education to the minor things we know of other cultures, research would be needed.
Special cases in education remind us that we're constantly becoming a more diverse society. Everyone originates from different places, if not multiple places. Identifying ourselves as one thing and many others creates a community that is much more than just Western-Euro middle class. What we need to realize is that by learning and understanding these special cases will help us not only learn in art, communication, and the world around us, but help us learn about ourselves as well.
16 years ago
